Letters from 1961 to 1973
Printed in 1961 (Dog World magazine and other publications)
"The Case Against The White German Shepherd Dog"
by Lloyd C Brackett
Of
late
there
has
been
a
recrudescence
of
the
"White"
German
Shepherd
Dog
subject.
DOG
WORLD
magazine
and
THE
WESTERN
SHEPHERD
JOURNAL,
in
particular,
have
printed
letters
about
this
controversy
between
the
pros
and
the
cons.
So
far
as
I
know,
THE
GERMAN
SHEPHERD
DOG
REVIEW
has
not
accepted
for
publication
any
letters
it
may
have
received
from
the
misguided
fringe
who
are
so
hopelessly
battling
against
our
breed’s
revised
Standard,
which
disqualifies
the
so-called
"whites."
This
is
understandable
and
to
its
credit
because,
in
contrast
to
DOG
WORLD,
for
instance,
which
is
an
all-breed
magazine,
working
for
the
best
interests
of
no
ONE
breed
exclusively,
the
REVIEW
has
that
objective
only.
Furthermore
it
is
the
official
organ
of
the
parent
body,
The
German
Shepherd
Dog
Club
of
America,
Inc.,
whose
capable,
dedicated
and
sincere
officers
and
board,
I
feel
certain,
will
never
countenance
any
lowering
of
the
breed’s
Standard
by
again
being
undiscriminating with regard to colorless Shepherds.
Before
going
into
the
reasons
which
eventually
impelled
us
to
do
what
should
have
been
done
long
ago,
i.e.,
include
a
disqualifying
clause
on
whites
in
the
breed
Standard,
I
want
to
mention
several
articles
previously
written
on
the
subject,
so
that
any
sufficiently
interested
can
refer
to
them,
especially
to
those
which
objected
to
the
disqualification.
Perhaps
I
should
use
make
it
clear
at
this
point
that
my
use
of
the
word
"us,"
above,
was
intentional,
since
I
was
a
member
of
the
Revision
Committee.
Also
that,
while
I
by
no
means
approved
of
everything
which
was
included
in
that
revision
and,
in
particular,
of
the
often
weird
evaluation
of
faults
in
the
supplement, I did, and do, wholeheartedly approve of disqualification of the so-called "whites."
By
far
the
best
and
most
objectively
written
argument
in
favor
of
whites
which
has
come
to
my
attention
appeared
in
the
February
1961
issue
of
THE
WESTERN
SHEPHERD
JOURNAL
under
the
title,
"The
Case
For
the
White
Shepherd"
by
June
Betsworth.
The
best
in
rebuttals
I
have
read
were
Mary
Coffeen’s
"Answers
to
‘The
White
Shepherd’"
in
the
April
issue
of
the
same
magazine,
and
William
Olliff’s
masterful
"Which
Is
the
More
Unsightly
Shepherd?"
appearing
in
the
April
DOG
WORLD’s
Shepherd
Section.
While
it
may
be
the
latter
two
writers
have
sufficiently
covered
the
case
for
the
"antis,"
it
seems
to
me
that
further
explanation
is
necessary relating to the PRACTICAL and UTILITARIAN reasons for disqualifying whites.
As
little
as
some
of
today’s
novices
and
commercially
minded
German
Shepherd
Dog
backyard
breeders
may
know
of
the
founders
and
early
developers
of
our
breed
in
Germany,
certainly
we
must
all
admit
that
it
would
never
have
reached
its
heights,
both
in
popularity
and
practicability
of
use,
except
for
them.
They
knew
what
they
were
doing
when
they
proscribed
both
the
registration
and
the
breeding
use
of
whites,
and
they
surely
had
the
breed’s
interests
more
in
mind
than
those
motivated
as
are
today’s
off-beat
proponents
of
such
animals.
We
might
argue
extensively
as
to
the
Germans’
claim
that
degeneration
is
indicated
in
colorless
Shepherds,
but
that
is
certainly
not
the
only
factor
to
be
considered,
though
it
may
be
one
of
the
most
important.
Suffice
it
to
say
that
were
our
breed’s
registry
handled
in
America
as
it
is
in
the
country
of
its
origin
(by
a
"parent
club"
instead
of
by
such
an
all-breed
organization
as
our
American
Kennel
Club),
whites
would
be
barred from registration so there could be no question of disqualification in shows.
In
the
early
days
of
Postum
advertising,
which,
incidentally,
was
during
the
early
days
of
German
Shepherds’
importation
to
this
country,
we
saw
many
Postum
advertisements
including
the
slogan,
"There’s
a
Reason."
Likewise,
for
disqualifying
white
Shepherds
and,
yes,
for
barring
them
from
registration,
could
it
be
done
in
this
country,
there
are
several
"reasons."
I
propose
to
explain
only
a
few
of
them,
in
fact,
just
those
I
have
read,
or
which,
if
touched
upon,
were
wrongly
interpreted.
For
instance,
the
pro-white
protagonists
claim
the
superiority
of
whites
as
leaders
of
the
blind
because
of
their
greater
visibility
or
as
a
symbol,
such
as
is
the
white
cane.
It
seems
strange
that
this
assertion
should
be
made
seemingly
without
inquiry
to
the
several
blind
dog
schools
as
to
WHY
they
do
not
accept
or
use
white
Shepherds,
although
the
reason
would
seem
obvious.
As
one
reply
to
this
patently
faulty
argument
has
pointed
out,
the
hypersensitive
blind
person
wants
least
of
all
to
have
his
affliction
made
noticeable.
More
important,
perhaps,
-
and
I
acquired
this
knowledge
through
personal
questioning
many
years
ago
–
is
the
matter
of
white
hairs
all
over
the
clothing
of
guide
dog
users,
as
well
as
on
those
who
may
inadvertently
brush
against
the
dogs
in
heavy
traffic.
No
amount
of
brushing
or
grooming
can
possibly
eliminate
ALL
such
shedding
hair
when
a
Shepherd
is
"throwing
its
coat,"
as
owners
will
attest.
It
seems
needless
to
point
out
that
a
blind
person
can
neither
see
to
brush
off
those
so
very
noticeable
white
hairs
from
clothing
or
upholstered
furniture,
nor
pick
off
those
imbedded
in
the
fabric
despite
the
brisket of brushings.
It
so
happens
that
those
who,
in
their
printed
letters
and
articles,
have
tried
to
make
out
the
strongest
case
FOR
the
whites
have,
no
doubt
unknowingly,
presented
the
most
plausible
and
REAL
objections
to
them.
This
is
true
not
only
in
the
above
example
but
equally
so
in
all
of
the
other
arguments
given,
with
the
exception
of
the
one
admitting
to
getting
hurt
in
the
pocketbook.
Than
this
latter,
no
reason
could
be
more
damaging
in
the
eyes
of
true
dog
lovers,
and
most
certainly
it
comes
as
a
shock
to
sincere
fanciers
of
the
present,
as
well
as
those
of
us
who
have
worked
for
the
improvement
of
the
breed
since
its
first
importation
to
this
country.
It
is
difficult for me not to castigate those imbued with such a purely mercenary motive and spirit, whose selfishness, if they had their way, would degrade our breed.
In
their
statement
that
the
German
Shepherd
Dog
was
first
purified
from
a
group
of
superior
working
animals
by
the
late
and
great
Herr
Von
Stephanitz
and
his
associates,
and
that
it
should
be
kept
to
the
same
high
standard,
they
are
absolutely
RIGHT.
But
perhaps
we
should
examine
the
facts
of
their
claim
as
to
the
necessity,
or
even
the
advisability,
of
including
whites
if
we
are
to
keep
it
a
"natural"
working
breed.
As
with
their
reasons
for
the
use
of
whites
as
guide
dogs,
just
as
faulty
are
the
arguments
favoring
whites
for
those
other
utilitarian
purposes
for
which
Shepherds
were
originally
used
(animal
herding
and
protection)
and
for
which
they have proved to be superior since.
Suppose
we
skip
to
the
self-evident
problem
of
keeping
white
service
dogs
clean
and
take
up
briefly
several
functional
disadvantages
of
the
whites.
In
the
early
days,
no
German
sheep
herdsman
wanted,
or
used,
whites
because
of
the
difficulty
in
distinguishing
sheep
from
dogs
at
a
distance.
In
police
work
it
is
apparent
that
white
dogs
would
be
at
a
disadvantage
at
night,
in
dark
alleys
and
streets,
where
their
appearance
would
be
blazoned
forth
to
warn
scoundrels
and
thugs
of
their
imminent
approach.
Even
the
strongest
of
the
proponents
of
the
colorless
Shepherds
admit
their
ineffectuality
for
work
with
the
police
and
the
armed
forces,
and
grant
that
shedding white hair is a drawback to their use as pets and companions.
What,
may
I
ask,
remains
for
anyone
to
say
in
defense
of
whites
when
it
comes
to
the
utilitarian
uses
which
all
admit
must
be
the
final
criterion
for
the
worth
of
our
breed?
As I understand it, white cannot properly be termed a color because it is a lack of all pigment. While I have several times referred to whites as "colorless" dogs in this
article,
I
myself
have
never
seen
a
pure
white
German
Shepherd
Dog
which
was
not
an
albino.
Only
a
single
person
amongst
the
many
fanciers
with
whom
I
have
discussed
the
matter
claims
to
have
seen
an
adult
"white"
dog
which
did
not
have
some
buff
or
tan
on
the
ears
or
back.
Young
puppies,
yes,
many
of
them.
This
is
not
to
say
there
have
not
been
many
pure
white
Shepherds
with
dark
eyes
and
black
noses,
but
just
that,
of
the
thousands
of
German
Shepherds
I
have
judged
and
seen, I have never encountered one without at least a trace of color.
It
is
indeed
regrettable
and
reprehensible
that
many
of
those
who
accidentally
get
one
white
or
more
in
a
litter
foist
them
off
on
an
ignorant
public
as
something
rare
and
therefore
desirable,
that
they
often
ask
higher
prices
for
them.
It
is
heartening
that
the
great
majority
of
our
fanciers,
and
all
of
those
who
are
interested
in,
and
work
for,
breed
improvement,
discard
such
untypical
specimens.
Such
breeders
either
put
whites
to
sleep
at
birth,
or
sell
them
WITHOUT
registration
papers,
and
at
greatly reduced prices, to pet buyers who are not knowledgeable enough to understand their handicaps.
I
can
do
no
better
than
to
second
the
motion
made
by
William
Olliff
in
his
April
DOG
WORLD
article:
"Please
leave
Shepherds
alone
and
stick
to
another
breed
where
the normal color is white."
White Genes - © “Sedona’s Artwork” by Kathy Partch
Quotes taken from article printed in the October 1972 GSDCA Review
Why Don't We Like the White German Shepherd Dog?
By Ellen Mattingly, Ph.D.
"Geneticists
are
frequently
asked
by
even
long-term
breeders
of
the
German
Shepherd
Dog
just
what
the
basis
is
genetically
for
the
prohibition
in
our
Standard
against
the
white
animal,
and
are
also
told,
frequently,
quite
vituperatively,
by
owners
of
white
dogs
that
our
disqualification
of
the
white
animal
is
merely
another
example
of
the
senseless
prejudices
they
find
in
show
people.
While
it
is
not
possible
to
speak
directly
for
the
originators
of
the
Standard,
it
is
possible
to
guess
some
of
the
serious
reasons
that
dictated
the
disqualification
of
the
white
dog
while
other
undesirable
faults,
as
for
example,
long
coat,
are
only
considered
serious
faults."
"Let
us
now
consider
what
problems
arise
through
the
use
of
such
white
German
Shepherd
Dogs
in
breeding
programs.
The
difficulty
one
hears
mentioned
most
frequently
is
the
association
or
linkage
of
solid
white
with
hearing
loss
or
other
developmental
abnormalities.
The
best
evidence
of
deafness
in
association
with
white
color
is
from
studies
of
the
blue
merle
series
of
alleles
in
Collies
and
Shelties
in
which
the
animal
who
is
homozygous
recessive
for
the
blue
merle
genes
will
be solid white and may be deaf, etc."
"In
the
first
place,
since
the
majority
of
"White
German
Shepherd
Dogs"
are
in
reality
extreme
cream
dilutes,
the
introduction
of
cream
dilutes
alleles
into
a
colored
line
will
certainly
begin
immediately
to
dilute
the
color
of
the
line.
An
example
of
the
extremes
to
which
color
dilution
problems
can
go
is
seen
in
Great
Britain
where
the
severe
quarantine
tends
to
limit
the
importation
of
new
genes
into
the
pool
and
the
struggle
against
fading
pigment
is
unending.
One
might
expect
that
an
animal
who
was
heterozygous
for
a
color
dilution
gene,
i.e.,
one
who
only
carried
a
single
recessive
for
dilute
color,
would
show
no
effect.
This,
unfortunately,
does
not
seem
to
be
true
since
a
color
dilution
gene
will
tend
to
diminish
color
even
when
present
in
the
heterozygous
state,
and
thus
we
worry
about
such
manifestations
as
light
toenails
and
vanishing
saddles
in
animals
which
otherwise
seem
to
be
brilliantly
pigmented,
and
we
are
well
advised
to
breed
such
animals
with care."
"I
have
considered
in
this
article
the
chief
reasons
that
the
whites
or
cream
dilutes
would
be
deleterious
to
the
German
Shepherd
Dog
genetically;
it
does
not
take
too
much
imagination
to
see
that
they
would
present
some
rather
severe
problems
functionally
as
well.
A
German
Shepherd
Dog
herding
stock
in
a
snow-covered
field
or
herding
white
sheep
in
any
weather
would
be
somewhat
less
than
optimally
visible
if
he
were
also
white;
we
see,
in
fact,
that
the
majority
of
the
herding
breeds
are
brilliantly
pigmented.
It
is
of
course
true
that
German
Shepherd
Dogs
are
rarely
used
at
the
present
time
for
herding
either
cattle
or
sheep.
On
the
other
hand,
the
German
Shepherd
Dog
is
used
extensively
for
guard
and
sentry
duty,
much
of
which
seems
to
be
done
at
night,
and,
in
this
case,
the
white
color
makes
for
maximum
visibility
which
would
certainly
be
a
disadvantage.
Finally,
the
problems
we
face
in
keeping
our
pigmented
German
Shepherd
Dogs
presentable
are
magnified many times with the white dog; the White German Shepherd Dogs I know spend a lot of time in the bathtub."
The following rebuttal was sent to the GSDCA Review but was not published.
It appeared in "The Shepherd's Din", Jan-Feb-March 1973.
Why We Do Like the White German Shepherd
By Peter Lorenz Neufeld, Ph. D.
This
morning
(March
19,
1973)
an
American
friend
of
mine
sent
me
a
copy
of
an
article
called
"Why
Don't
We
Like
the
White
German
Shepherd
Dog?"
by
Dr.
Ellen
Mattingly
which
your
magazine
carried
October,
1972.
As
one
who
was
deeply
involved
in
researching
this
variety
from
1961-70
and
the
author
of
the
book
THE
INVINCIBLE
WHITE
SHEPHERD
I
feel
I
can't
allow
this
particular
nonsense
to
go
unchallenged,
even
though
it's
a
belated
challenge.
The
impression
I
get
from
reading
the
article
is
that
Dr.
Mattingly
has
simply
transposed
the
present
knowledge
of
mice
color
genetics
to
German
Shepherds.
The
question
that
I,
and
I'm
sure
many
readers,
would
like
answered
is:
Exactly
how
much
research
on
color
genetics
involving
GERMAN
SHEPHERDS
has
actually
been
carried
on
by
the
Zoology
Department at University of Georgia?
Or is the fact Dr. Mattingly's employed there supposed to impress dark shepherd breeders and scare the daylights out of white shepherd breeders?
With
many
thousands
of
white
shepherd
dogs
in
the
world,
and
the
fact
they
were
common
from
the
very
beginning,
there's
no
greater
problem
finding
a
good
white
sire
than
a
dark
one.
Dr.
Mattingly
would
like
us
to
believe
white
shepherds
are
supposedly
rare
and
recent
phenomena.
Nothing
could
be
further
from
the
truth.
The
only
thing
that
somewhat
recent
(less
than
40
years
old)
is
PREJUDICE
involving
white
shepherds.
With
a
little
digging
she'll
find
it
originated
in
Germany during the Hitler era and spread to North America from there.
Many
early
German
Shepherds
were
white
and
highly
prized.
Austrian-German-Prussian
royalty
(the
Hapsburgs)
prized
this
variety
as
highly
as
they
did
their
white
Lippizana
horses
which
drew
the
royal
carriages.
As
regards
sheepherding,
many
early
herdsmen
preferred
white
dogs
because
they
were
easier
to
distinguish
from
the
darker
European
wolves
at
night;
this
despite
the
lesser
problem
of
distinguishing
them
from
sheep.
The
earliest
breeder
of
white
German
Shepherds
on
this
continent
was
Anne
(Tracy)
Eristoff
of
New
York.
A
popular
judge
of
German
Shepherds
she
was
the
main
founder
of
the
German
Shepherd
Club
of
America,
her
first
litter
in
1913
being
line-bred
on
Luchs
-
the
first
U.S.
German
Shepherd
Champion.
Another
American,
Lloyld
Brackett
-
prominent
in
the
recent
movement
to
bar
white
shepherds
from
dog
shows
in
the
U.S.
-
whose
famous
Longworth
Kennel
of
Allegan,
Michigan
is
prized
as
foundation
stock
in
most
dark
North
American German Shepherd lines, probably distributed more white German Shepherd genes on this continent than any other breeder.
If
Dr.
Mattingly
really
has
done
unbiased
research
with
white
German
Shepherds
and
isn't
simply
venting
her
own
personal
prejudices
then
she
must
have
learned
there
are
actually
TWO
distinct
types
of
white
genes
-
one
which
produces
white
hairs
and
dark
skin
(commonly
called
dark-point
white)
and
one
which
produces
white
-
usually
murky
-
hairs
and
pink
skin
(commonly
called
albino
or
partial
albino).
Both
are
more
recessive
than
dark
genes.
The
latter,
however,
when
bred
to
a
dark
shepherd,
will
usually
result
in
offspring
with
coats
not
as
dark
as
that
of
the
dark
parent
(this
gene
started
the
"fading
color"
theory);
not
so
the
former.
Also,
except
in
regions
with
very
warm
winters
and
long
hours
of
sunshine
it's
quite
easy
to
recognize
those
white
shepherds
who
carry
one
albino
gene
(have
only
one
dark-point
white
gene)
because
during
winter
the
dark
pigment
-
nose,
etc.,
-
fades.
It's
much
more
difficult
to
detect
a
carrier
of
albino
genes
in
dark
shepherd
dogs.
It's
quite
conceivable
that
a
greater
percentage
of
dark
shepherds
are
currently
carrying
albino
genes
recessively
than
are
dark-point
white
shepherds.
The
murky
"saddle"
to
which
Dr.
Mattingly
refers
to,
is
sometimes
present
in
albino
shepherds
but
never
in
pure
dark-point
white
ones.
Pure
dark-point
white shepherds always breed true.
It
is
true,
as
Dr.
Mattingly
points
out,
the
color
white
in
sentry
dogs
is
considered
a
disadvantage
by
some
at
night.
The
U.S.A.F.
and
several
police
forces,
for
example,
have
discontinued
using
white
shepherds
for
this
reason.
But
no
one
is
claiming
white
shepherds
are
superior
to
dark
shepherds
in
every
instance;
in
some
yes,
in
others
not.
However,
many
persons
love
the
white
variety
which
has
been
an
integral
and
important
part
of
the
German
Shepherd
breed
from
the
beginning
(unlike
solid
black,
for
example,
which
is
more
recent).
I
personally
like
both
white
shepherds
AND
dark
shepherds,
have
owned
both
varieties
for
many
years.
By
all
means
let's
eliminate
albino
genes.
Few
dark-point
white
shepherd
breeders
would
argue
this
point;
and
would
have
much
less
difficulty
than
would
dark shepherd breeders.
Quotes taken from article printed in the June 1960 GSDCA Review
By Maureen Yentzen
"White
German
Shepherd
Dogs
have
always
existed
in
the
breed,
as
they
are
mentioned
in
its
earliest
histories.
They
are
not
to
be
confused
with
albinos,
as
the
true
albino
carries
pink
eyes
and
nose,
of
course,
while
many
white
German
Shepherds
Dogs
have
dark
eyes
and
black
noses.
Nevertheless,
the
whites
have
never been considered desirable and certainly no serious breeders have ever sought deliberately to breed this color."
"I
have
probably
not
seen
more
than
a
dozen
whites,
yet
every
one
of
them
carried
a
much
too
short
tail,
in
which
the
last
vertebrae
was
some
inches
above
the
hock
joint,
rather
than
properly
reaching
to
the
back
joint
at
least,
as
the
Standard
calls
for.
White
German
Shepherd
Dogs
appear
in
"dilute"
pedigrees
also,
and
perhaps
are
the
causes
of
dilution.
[snipped]
We
are
frank
to
admit
that
we
do
not
completely
understand
how
whites
function
in
German
Shepherd
Dogs
as
we
have conflicting evidence on them."
"I
would
say
that
a
black
which
carries
a
white
recessive
would
most
likely
show
this
by
white
toes
and
nails
or
a
large
white
blaze
on
chest,
or
both.
White
toes
with
their
accompanying
white
nails
are
certainly
undesirable
in
a
black,
(or
in
any
other
color)
and
any
serious
breeder
who
wishes
to
be
sure
of
maintaining
pigment,
whether
in
agouti,
pattern,
or
self
color,
will
discard
these
puppies.
The
fact
that
the
white
toes
"disappear"
by
later
turning
silver
does
not
alter
the
fact
that
the
pup
was
born
with
white
toes,
and
it
does
not
alter
the
fact
that
the
white
toes
are
a
fairly
reliable
indication
of
the
existence
of
a
gene
for
paling,
for
dilution, or even for a white factor. And, of course, the light nails will remain light, even though the white toes turn silver or cream."
"It
is
only
reasonable
to
add
in
the
interests
of
truth
that
the
great
majority
of
"normal
colored"
dogs
which
figure
in
dilute
pedigrees
are
not
black
and
rich
tans
but
black
and
silvers
and
black
and
creams.
These
varieties
of
the
pattern
are
so
very
popular
in
some
quarters
that
they
have
been
bred
from
extensively
with
little
attention
to
gradual
loss
of
pigment
in
their
descendants.
There
is
a
great
deal
of
evidence
to
prove
that
they
are
responsible
for
much
of
the
dilution
and
carry
a
recessive
gene
for
dilution
which
when
coupled
up
with
the
same
recessive
from
a
dog
of
similar
coloring,
produces
the
"blue"
version
of
the
black
and
tan."
"We
believe
that
many
have
wondered
why
the
new
Standard
explicitly
demands
a
black
nose.
As
the
blues
have
grey
noses
and
the
few
surviving
livers
have
brown
noses,
we
think
the
reason
is
clear.
It
is
the
one
means
to
bar
off-colors
in
the
show
ring.
If
they
are
not
allowed
to
be
shown,
they
will
not
be
bred
from
by
serious
breeders.
There
is
no
more
reason
to
allow
a
German
Shepherd
Dog
with
a
grey
or
brown
nose
in
the
ring,
than
to
allow
a
white
German
Shepherd
Dog
with
a
black
nose,
in
our
opinion.
The
off-colors
are
due
to
recessive
genes,
and
they
could
become
so
strongly
entrenched
in
the
various
bloodlines
that
an
average of 25% of every litter could be off-color."
This website was first launched in 1998 - If you have questions about the site or corrections, please mail the webmaster
© Pride Webdesign 2016
WHITE SHEPHERD LIBRARY OF KIMBERLY’S PRIDE